View Full Version : Jag S Type R - Any knowledge
Roberto
15-02-2010, 04:53 PM
I've been browsing again, dangerous I know.
But might go have a look at this:
http://www.carzone.ie/search/Jaguar/S-Type/R-4.2--(/201002196577344/advert?channel=CARS
Any body got any experience of these?
miller
15-02-2010, 04:54 PM
sorry mate thats just downright disgusting excuse for car styling!!!
My opinion though! Not yours and we are all different!
Anyways why you looking again lol
Roberto
15-02-2010, 04:58 PM
Anyways why you looking again lol
I'm allways having a look, 5 1/2 years with the same motor is an age for me.
But can never find a decent replacement.
WildCards
15-02-2010, 04:58 PM
Love it, although the S Type wasn't the last word in build quality, but that engine is astonishingly quick.
Roberto
15-02-2010, 05:00 PM
Love it, although the S Type wasn't the last word in build quality, but that engine is astonishingly quick.
Can the rest of the car keep up with though?
I would love something unusual, but quick.
Ah, who knows what will happen.
WildCards
15-02-2010, 05:03 PM
I've only been in 3.0 S Type, it seemed acceptable, a cut above a VR-4 anyway. I was passenger in an XKR with the same engine as the S Type R and it really did blow my mind away with it's straightline pace, they're heavy though and aren't built for B road blasting so don't expect it to set your world alight in the twisties.
bradc
15-02-2010, 07:01 PM
They are definitely more of a high speed cruiser designed for motorways. Pity they are one of the ugliest cars ever.
I'd rather cruise around in one of these:
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1502378.htm
H
bradc
15-02-2010, 07:16 PM
Indeed, that S8 is a heap better.
giblet
15-02-2010, 07:20 PM
From what I read, the S type r has some horrible repair costs when things start to go wrong, seems build quality on them isn't great! Have a look at the XJ's instead, the X350 4.2 V8 sport can be picked up for 10k or so now, the one I drove felt just as quick as my VR4, looks the business and the interior is awesome
KiwiTT
15-02-2010, 08:25 PM
I am probably one of the few who like the nostalgic "S-Type" and the R would be one I would get. I am disappointed that it's build quality is lacking. I have always liked the old Mk II.
But can never find a decent replacement.And you won't ... ;)
Which is why I have decided to keep my rVR-4 egardless of current servicing costs. This year is going to be an expensive year. "D" Service, new Exhaust and new tyres, but thay will make it last a few more years yet.
Isn't this the last shape that Jaguar made as Jaguar before Ford took over?
bradc
16-02-2010, 07:35 AM
The Mark II is a nice looking car, but the S Type is an abomination. I'd prefer my Hyundai, at least people don't think you're trying if you have one of those.
miller
16-02-2010, 10:28 AM
Brad,
I just fell over and picked myself up to type this.....we agree on something!
stuey
16-02-2010, 12:16 PM
Isn't this the last shape that Jaguar made as Jaguar before Ford took over?
Ford owned Jaguar since about 1991. I had one of the last of the 4 litre XJ6 sovereign's, best motorway mile eater ever...
Shhhhht - according to Wiki they owned Jaguar since 1989! :rolleyes3 Sheeeesh, I didn't know it extended that far back.
gareth001
16-02-2010, 12:34 PM
I've heard the S Type described as a Mondeo with a Jag badge
giblet
16-02-2010, 12:52 PM
I've heard the S Type described as a Mondeo with a Jag badge
Thats the X-Type, which uses the same platform as the mondeo
gareth001
16-02-2010, 01:07 PM
Thats the X-Type, which uses the same platform as the mondeo
Oh yeah - my bad :oops:
Kitty's VR4
16-02-2010, 03:53 PM
I can tell you from personal experience, they stand up pretty well to high speed MVA's, they also go extremely well, my other half owned a 2003 from new for nearly 7 years till the 23rd of November when I sent it to Jag heaven. (not my fault)
We had no problems with it whatsoever, but like everything, it really depends on how well they're looked after !!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.