PDA

View Full Version : boost cut load limiter - ID 23810004



fassi1
22-07-2013, 09:12 PM
Downloaded ROM of my mates Legnum auto with ID 23810004 which is late facelift.
Trying to raise boost cut limit but noticed that RPM row and graph look strange having the same strangly high value,
what's the reason for that?
Does it need sorting out or just raise boost cut limit values without worrying about RPM row?

Davezj
22-07-2013, 11:08 PM
I have seen some odd rom tables which don't seem to make any sense at all, as if they have been badly adjusted in the past by someone hat really did not know what they were doing.
That table is not right at all, you are right, it should be an rpm range, and I set mine to 220 or 240 accross the board, as my boost is 1.5 bar at times, lol.

fassi1
23-07-2013, 12:13 AM
Thanks Dave
RPM range sorted and limits sorted, upload 2morrow.

Davezj
23-07-2013, 06:54 AM
I found some really odd tables in Adams rom with regard to rpm ranges, some of them had rpm's of 4000, 240000, 250000, 4500000.
There were a few tables with screwed up rpm ranges.

fassi1
23-07-2013, 07:01 AM
That is interesting. I wonder if that's the result of poor tuning or some kind of software's error.

lateshow
23-07-2013, 09:51 AM
The rpm axis is situated somewhere else... 23810004 is auto type s with tcl? Have seen that rom in only one car and that was 98 auto with tcl.

fassi1
23-07-2013, 10:22 AM
It is auto Type S but not sure if it has tcl, I wouldn't say so.
It's definitely late facelift.
So do you reckon that rpm axis is correct?

Strange thing is that all the other tables and rpm axis look perfectly fine.

lateshow
23-07-2013, 11:56 AM
I suspect that the axis is situated in another adress. That adress maybe correct for other roms..... but if the data itself is correct you may go ahead and edit it. Just put 250 or 260 everywhere and that's it.

fassi1
23-07-2013, 12:23 PM
Alright so you saying leave rpm axis alone and just go ahead with boost cut limit values?

lateshow
23-07-2013, 06:03 PM
Yes.

fassi1
24-07-2013, 06:57 AM
Big thanks Lauri, like always very helpful.

Davezj
24-07-2013, 07:07 AM
I saw the same issue, most tables were correct with respect to rpm scale, but there were about 3 or 4 tables where it was screwed up.
If post it up on her could you have a look at it just to confirm the issue.
I am going to work now, but I will post it up tonight when I get back.

fassi1
24-07-2013, 10:19 AM
Will definitely have a look at them.
Just post them up here.