Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Optimum Exhaust Size

  1. #1
    zentac's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Richard
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    02-03-2022
    Posts
    2,602
    Country
    England
    Location
    Rotherham
    Car
    600+ bhp FTO-VR
     

    Optimum Exhaust Size

    Anyone know what the best diameter is for a VR4 exhaust main pipework. Im guessing 3 inch.

    Anyone know what the diameter of the standard exhaust is?
    Richard Batty
    2.5ltr V6 Turbo FTO

  2. #2

    Offline
     
    Name
    Edmund
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    02-03-2016
    Posts
    314
    Country
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Location
    San Fernando, T
    Car
    96 & 92 Galant
     

    Stock Exhaust

    Stock exhaust pipe is 2.25" diameter which is the same as on the 7G VR4 which as you know has the 6A12TT INSERT INTO post VALUES (2000cc V6) engine. I think 3" mandrel bent pipe would be ideal.
    Ed

  3. #3
    Brind's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    M Brindley
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    25-05-2014
    Posts
    3,887
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Location
    SE Hampshire
    Car
    Ralliart VR-4 S
     
    3 inch is the diameter of the HKS cat back Super Drager.
    I'll take Edmunds word for the 2.25" standard as I don't have a clue.

  4. #4
    zentac's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Richard
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    02-03-2022
    Posts
    2,602
    Country
    England
    Location
    Rotherham
    Car
    600+ bhp FTO-VR
     
    Thanks guys, 3" it will be then.

  5. #5
    Roadrunner's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Brian
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    24-10-2012
    Posts
    3,062
    Country
    Scotland
    Location
    Scottish Border
    Car
    VR4, S60R, GT-R
     
    Be careful. Replacing a complete 2.25" exhaust with a 3" one is likely to change the characteristics of the torque curve significantly. Expect maximum torque to be developed much higher up in the rev range. I did a similar thing with my Legacy RS-B INSERT INTO post VALUES (2.5" standard, replaced with 3") and it moved everything 1000 revs higher - lots of power at the top end, but much less torque at the low end. Probably a bit smoother to drive, but did take away some of the fun of the low-down torque.

    As an aside, IIRC, works Evo and Subaru rally cars use a 2.5" exhaust front to back.

    Brian
    S60R | GT-R

    artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity

  6. #6

    Offline
     
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Last Online
    03-01-2010
    Posts
    16
    Country
    England
    Location
    Chichester, Sussex
     
    That surprises me a little. I was under the impression that back pressure, or lack of it, was not so much of an issue with turbo cars as with normally aspirated, given that the turbo completely messes with the airflow anyway. My understanding was that a bigger bore would allow quicker spool up time and of course make it easier to expell greater amounts of exhaust gases.

    Then again, a 12" bore would be over the top, so there must obviously be a peak level. I would have thought 3" was about right, I believe that is standard on a P1. I also know of people who've gone for 3" straight through on scoobies and found it to be of great benefit, although they didn't mention if everything was shifted up the rev range - definately interested to read that as I was thinking of increasing the bore of my exhaust with a custom job, but I do like low down torque so might need to think further on it

  7. #7

    Offline
     
    Name
    calum
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    02-01-2021
    Posts
    390
    Country
    Scotland
    Location
    aberdeen, uk
     
    In theory, for maximum power, after the turbo you want a 'conical' trumpet, increasing in size to as big as you can get under the car.

    In practice, fit whatever you can get in. The design of the exhaust INSERT INTO post VALUES (good or bad) has more to do with how it performs on the car than the diameter.

    Custom made ones can be a good idea if the shop knows what it's doing INSERT INTO post VALUES (Hayward & Scott, for example) but can be a bad investment if they've not got a clue about good exhaust design.

    If you are in doubt, I would suggest going with a good jap exhaust, mook.

    I read an excellent article on this somewhere but don't know if I'll be able to find it - if I do I'll post teh link up.

    Calum

  8. #8

    Offline
     
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Last Online
    03-01-2010
    Posts
    16
    Country
    England
    Location
    Chichester, Sussex
     
    Cheers Calum, would appreciate that

  9. #9

    Offline
     
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Last Online
    25-02-2007
    Posts
    15
    Country
    Other
    Location
    Singapore
     

    Optimum Exhaust Size

    Optimum Exhaust Size
    Anyone know what the best diameter is for a VR4 exhaust main pipework. Im guessing 3 inch.

    Anyone know what the diameter of the standard exhaust is?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hi
    Wif regards to your query...I have customed front pipe for my VR4 2.5" each bank linked to a 3" main pipe...
    Followed by 3" thru' dummy cat

    After the cat piping is reduced to 2.75" all the way to the tail muffler which is a straight thru 3". In between is a 22" silencer INSERT INTO post VALUES (internal diameter is 3").

    I find this setup is better compared to having 3" all thru INSERT INTO post VALUES (which I orig. done).

    Having 3" all thru' is very good for high revs but gives very weak low rev.

    my 2 cents//

  10. #10
    Roadrunner's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Brian
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Last Online
    24-10-2012
    Posts
    3,062
    Country
    Scotland
    Location
    Scottish Border
    Car
    VR4, S60R, GT-R
     
    Having 3" all thru' is very good for high revs but gives very weak low rev
    ... which was my experience with my Legacy as I said above. It was interesting to note on the Jim Clark Memorial Rally recently that ALL the World Rally Cars INSERT INTO post VALUES (Subaru, Mitsubishi, Ford) and most INSERT INTO post VALUES (can't guarantee is was all) of the top international and national class cars were using relatively narrow guage exhausts INSERT INTO post VALUES (certainly no wider than 2½ inch and may even have been narrower). As I mentioned before, this would give much better low-down torque and, as these cars rarely run flat out for any length of time, good torque would be much more important for acceleration.

    Big bore exhausts might look and sound cool, but I don't think they make for a quicker car.

    Brian

Similar Threads

  1. Bigger wheels and tyres - size?
    By chris g in forum Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-05-2010, 08:21 AM
  2. what size wheels/tyres
    By jonnyloft in forum General Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 14-01-2004, 09:54 AM
  3. noisy exhaust ?
    By SGHOM in forum Engine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-01-2004, 11:23 PM
  4. What is size of front speakers?
    By Ultra VR-4 in forum General / Questions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-09-2003, 10:19 PM
  5. Noisy exhausts!
    By Pescha in forum General Chat
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-06-2003, 11:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •