Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Mitsubishi Evo Engine 2.3 Stroker 4G63

  1. #1
    CARMEL120's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    TREVOR
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    25-03-2013
    Posts
    455
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Location
    strabane
    Car
    bmw
     

    Mitsubishi Evo Engine 2.3 Stroker 4G63


  2. #2

    Offline
     
    Name
    Brad
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    20-10-2011
    Posts
    22,175
    Country
    New Zealand
    Location
    Karaka
    Car
    F/lift 5MT VR-4
     
    Thats pretty cool, for a bit less than that you can get a 2.5L V6 with two turbos and an entire car attached, and you still get 200cc more capacity!
    If I'm replying to your thread and helping you out, it is because I like you and want to help out your VR-4 ownership. No other reason

  3. #3
    WildCards's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    07-08-2015
    Posts
    9,452
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Location
    East Mids
    Car
    Saab 9-5 Estate
     
    That's an awful advert.

    If your selling an engine with uprated gubbins surely some engine dyno graphs are a must. No guarantee mentioned either, you'd have to be extremely rich or extremely stupid to throw £4k at what is essentially an unproven lump of metal.
    The best things in life have to be lubricated

  4. #4
    Turbo_Steve's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    19-06-2023
    Posts
    7,051
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Car
    Silver
     
    Unless it's known in the community.

    And brad...it's lighter then a 2.5L twin turbo, and is liable to make a lot more power. It's not got such a nice noise, or power delivery, but it's cheaper to upgrade, cheaper to run, and will support a GT35R (or bigger) beautifully.
    Why would you want an unknown V6 with unknown limits over a known, forged engine.

  5. #5

    Offline
     
    Name
    Brad
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    20-10-2011
    Posts
    22,175
    Country
    New Zealand
    Location
    Karaka
    Car
    F/lift 5MT VR-4
     
    I'd argue that the engine above is largely unknown too, and that quite a few 6A13's are running 400-450hp on stock parts no problems. An a GT35R will sit ona 6A13 perfectly too

  6. #6
    CARMEL120's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    TREVOR
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last Online
    25-03-2013
    Posts
    455
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Location
    strabane
    Car
    bmw
     
    this is ryan`s father
    http://www.rallybuzz.com/gibson-metro-6r4-dirt-2/
    i dont no what bhp the evo engine is putting out i would like to think somewhere about 650hp for that money would be nice if it fitted into a vr4

  7. #7
    Turbo_Steve's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    19-06-2023
    Posts
    7,051
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Car
    Silver
     
    brad, sorry mate but that's just nonsense: if you're after a proven, reliable solution then it's the 4G63 all the way. And try getting 550bhp out of a 6A13TT for the sort of money you can on a 4G63.

    I understand what you're say re: value for money, but in simple terms if you're the kind of person spending £4000 on an engine then you're after a simple, easy, and above all proven formula.

  8. #8
    Turbo_Steve's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    19-06-2023
    Posts
    7,051
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Car
    Silver
     
    Look at it this way : how many race series are based on the 6A13TT?

  9. #9

    Offline
     
    Name
    mark
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last Online
    09-04-2023
    Posts
    1,131
    Country
    Ireland
    Location
    cork
    Car
    MANUAL SUPER
     
    two completely different engines for two completely different ways of driving.
    6a13 wouldnt have a chance on a back road ,but still a great engine for a standard one

  10. #10

    Offline
     
    Name
    Vadim
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Online
    05-05-2016
    Posts
    238
    Country
    Russia
    Location
    Moscow
    Car
    RED X SST
     
    good offer, if there tomei internals, and perfect condition, but if no.... think better build new from 4g64 from galant

    stock evo 9 engine up to 400bhp no prob

    6a13tt in our club in stock, now 450bhp (2xtd04-13).

    but if go to up 500+, build evo engine will cheaper then 6a13tt
    was LHD Legnum VR-4 Type S, 0,85 kg/m now , 4WD, AYC, [winter drift car team]
    was RHD Galant VR-4 MT, no AYC no cry
    was RHD Galant VR-4 GTR N1, ring racer, 407 hp
    JDM EVO 7 GSR
    Radical SR3 RS

  11. #11
    Turbo_Steve's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Steve
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    19-06-2023
    Posts
    7,051
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Car
    Silver
     
    Quote Originally Posted by lancerevo3
    6a13 wouldnt have a chance on a back road
    What on earth are you talking about? If anything the 6A13TT is MORE suited to windy back-roads - it's not significantly heavier than the 4G63T, and it has significantly better low-end torque charecteristics!

    Stock against Stock, I'd suggest it's actually a BETTER B/C road engine.
    With both engines given some basic mods, the 6A13 is going to be less laggy, MUCH more torquey throughout the range and only make slightly less peak power.

    It's not until you start changing turbos that the 4G63T suddenly becomes a better proposition, and that's because manifolds and turbos (new) are cheaper and easier to fit.
    You will need to go internal sooner on the 4G63T, though, but it's a proven route....unlike the 6A13TT where you're going to be sucking up a lot of development costs past 450bhp.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •