Nice to see nothing has changed...................
Or some people...
I was being serious. I thought everyone else was fooling around
If I'm replying to your thread and helping you out, it is because I like you and want to help out your VR-4 ownership. No other reason
it was mainly messing around...until the op decided his thread was vital to the archives of CVR4....
I too was being serious. Just letting it be known that i have made an official complaint.. I mean come on ! Since when has "going nowhere" been a criteria for closing down a thread ?Originally Posted by bradc
If this were the case then there would harldly be any threads left open.. Obviously ELNEVIO was feeling left out and thought he would make sure he got the last word !
This is a dissapointing day in CVR4 history..
Wodj
PS... The Thread in Questionhttp://www.clubvr4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=50543
Lighthearted and heated debate at it's best
Last edited by Wodjno; 16-07-2010 at 11:47 PM.
Well I'll try and cheer everyone up
i still think the RS6 would wipe the floor with a VR4 stock for stock!!!
Still here somewhere........
Well you be able to present it later, once the thread is re-opened ....
Feel free to bait me all you like, but all it looks like is unbecoming. And calling my actions disappointing is somewhat ironic, when practically encouraging a flame war isn't?
Perhaps I didn't make it clear enough on the "going nowhere" point - perhaps I should have clarified the point that all the thread was doing, was in fact descending into the pitiful mire of vitriol and petty trolling.
I await the critically-assassinating responses on this open thread.
PS: The original decision to close the thread is being discussed in the Committee area.
October 2023 fleet status: 100% operational
|Legnum VR-4S | Fiat Panda 100HP !! | a blue one!
| VR-4 parts van! |
Why not become a full member of CVR4 and enjoy the additional benefits membership brings?! Information here.
bigger pans now in stock...
So answer me 1 question ?
Why have u not closed this thread ?
Id keep it locked to be honest.
Theres nothing more to discuss...everyone who produced figures proved the point that the RS6 is faster by a country mile, which is ironic when they were trying to argue to the contrary...
and the only other thing i learned was that the timing gear recording a 14mph increase in .3 of a second is faulty.
Seems to be healthy debate here, and not much of the aforementioned-by-me name-calling and petty squabbling.
It may well be a better option to tidy up the previous thread, then reopen it, but as already mentioned, this will be looked at in the Committee area. Might be a day or two I imagine, depending on everyone's availability to review the necessary information.
But you invite critically assasinating responses in this thread!Which can only point towards this thread then descending into a "PITIFIL MIRE OF VITRIOL AND PETTY TROLLING"
Last edited by Wodjno; 16-07-2010 at 11:15 AM.
Stop shouting Wodjno...!
If you are complaining, whinging, moaning, provoking or downright being a pain...
...we can hear more clearly what you say if said in a quieter way...
Different runs different days................
Country mile - interesting, again I have evidence to the contrary.
In my opinion, critically-assassinating posts and vitriolic petty trolling are mutually exclusive - if you're doing one, you can't be doing the other.
As you know I have about 200 timing slips to look through to find the data. As well as real time logging from all of the cars at the Bruntingthorpe thrash.
LOL its still coming down to the same thing as before though, what are we comparing..modded for modded, stock for stock etc etc...
And here is Chrisg, with nothing better to do on his day off but post useless, meaningless drivel .. His way of seeking retribution for his rancor for myself. But alas, only proving that
he's no better than those he melign's..
Last edited by Wodjno; 16-07-2010 at 11:20 AM.
Posting Permissions
