Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Volmetric Efficiency

  1. #1
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     

    Volmetric Efficiency

    Does anyone know the volumetric efficiency for the 6A13TT engine

    i know it is estimated that a 4 valve per cylinder engine is about 90% but I wanted to know if anyone had the exact value. I am talking about a standard engine not modified.

    Bye for Now!

  2. #2
    paulg23's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Paul
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Online
    09-07-2018
    Posts
    389
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Location
    Northampton
    Car
    VR4 - S
     
    Don't know it but if you can log some ecu parameters you will be able to calculate it. Guess you will have to disable the turbos.

    http://installuniversity.com/install...n_9.012000.htm
    Too much is just enough.

  3. #3
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    i would have thought some might know this

  4. #4
    Kenneth's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Kenneth
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    12-01-2024
    Membership ID
    NZ002
    Posts
    6,968
    Country
    New Zealand
    Location
    Cambridge
    Car
    Kia Sorento :P
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    Assuming your MAP sensor scaling is OK, then 2.6 bar is 1.6 bar of boost absolute (1 bar atmospheric + 1.6bar boost). Are you sure your MAP pressures are reading correctly?

    However, you should try working in kPa. Why? Because 100kPa = 1 bar and, conveniently for us, 100kPa @ 100% VE ROUGHLY translates to 100% load

    VE is therefore easy to calculate from your ECU logging. If you get 100kPa at 100% load at any RPM, then you effectively have 100% VE.
    If, on the other hand your MAP pressure is 260 kPa but your load is only 200, then VE = 200 / 260 * 100 or 76% VE

    I would expect that VE on a 6a13 to exceed 100% by a reasonable margin, probably 110% or more at peak torque.

    Quote Originally Posted by Davezj View Post
    yes i have the map senor fitted to rear O2 pin on ecu and i can monitor it on request 3C in evoscan.

    kenneth the MAP sensor is saying the boost pressure is 2.6 bar, is that 1 bar atmospheric + 1.3 bar boost or 2.6 bar of boost.

    OK i understand what you are saying about starting a new thread.

  5. #5
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    thanks kenneth,
    if the VE is around the 100%+ mark in the reagion where the turbo is at full spool, say 3000 rpm to 6000rpm then that would make a massive difference to my other calculations that i have been working on.

    i will have to start logging the data to see what it reviels.

    thanks again kenneth.

  6. #6
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    Ok so If I understand this correctly, if I am using a boost controller and it is set to 1 bar (100 kpa) and get into the 160 load cell, which I don't believe is a difficult thing to do.
    the VE is 160% at that point in the rev range surely that can't be right.


    Sent from my space-aged gizmo

  7. #7
    Kenneth's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Kenneth
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    12-01-2024
    Membership ID
    NZ002
    Posts
    6,968
    Country
    New Zealand
    Location
    Cambridge
    Car
    Kia Sorento :P
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    No, that isn't right.

    Remember what I wrote. 100% load is effectively the same as 100kPa at 100% VE.

    This is the major difference between MAP and MAF, and why MAF is, at least on a production vehicle, a better solution.
    160 load could be 160kPa at 100% VE. It could also be 100kPa at 160% VE (given constant temperature, which isn't really going to happen). A MAF is designed to measure mass air flow, which coupled with mass fuel flow, is able to give consistent AFR over a wide operating range and also be tolerant of changes in VE over time.

    MAP on the other hand, requires VE to be a known constant so that it can use the MAP pressure and temperature (plus baro etc) to calculate fuel requirement. As soon as VE changes, you have a change in your fuel because the air mass flow changes.

    Anyway, back on track.
    Lets say 100% load = 100kPa at 100% VE. When you are pushing through more boost, you are increasing the kPa value as well as the load value. So all you do is re-arrange the formula and get something like 160 load at 160kPa = 100% VE.
    This is why you log MAP and Load @ RPM. by knowing load (and assuming load = kPa at 100% VE) you can then calculate the VE.

    Does that make sense?

    Quote Originally Posted by Davezj View Post
    Ok so If I understand this correctly, if I am using a boost controller and it is set to 1 bar (100 kpa) and get into the 160 load cell, which I don't believe is a difficult thing to do.
    the VE is 160% at that point in the rev range surely that can't be right.

  8. #8
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     

    Volmetric Efficiency

    So it is

    (load / kpa) * 100 = VE %

    (100 / 100 ) * 100 = 100% VE

    100 kpa @ 100 load VE = 100%

    160 kpa @ 160 load VE = 100%

    I get that above ,
    so the below must be true.

    120 kpa @ 100 load VE = 83%

    100 kpa @ 120 load VE= 120%

    100 kpa @ 160 load VE = 160%

    Which is what I said above isn't it.....

    or am i still missing something?

    i have sent you some rep points for being so helpful and understanding when i probably asking some stupid questions.

    Sent from my space-aged gizmo
    Last edited by Davezj; 08-07-2016 at 04:33 PM.

  9. #9
    Kenneth's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Kenneth
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    12-01-2024
    Membership ID
    NZ002
    Posts
    6,968
    Country
    New Zealand
    Location
    Cambridge
    Car
    Kia Sorento :P
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    1 bar of boost = 200kPa absolute, roughly. So that is about 80% VE

  10. #10
    Davezj's Avatar

    Offline
     
    Name
    Dave
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Last Online
    Today
    Membership ID
    255
    Posts
    16,248
    Country
    England
    Location
    Manchester
    Car
    VR-4
    My Garage
    Visit
     
    Quote Originally Posted by Kenneth View Post
    1 bar of boost = 200kPa absolute, roughly. So that is about 80% VE
    yes ok i missed that fundamental point that the kpa is absolute pressure so atmosphere plus boost pressure.

    so using that info,

    200kpa (1 bar boost) @160 load VE = 80%

    so at any given load value as you increase the boost pressure the VE goes down.

    the 100% VE at 160 load is 0.6 bar boost.

Similar Threads

  1. Fuel Efficiency
    By Physician in forum General Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 15-12-2008, 05:02 PM
  2. Efficiency
    By enigma in forum General Chat
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 21-11-2003, 10:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •